Decision Process is in private beta. Request early access →

Rigorous experimentation for every domain

Run experiments across every part of your business.

Decision Process is a general-purpose experimentation platform — built for product teams, retail operations, agricultural researchers, and manufacturing engineers alike. If you have a question that data can answer, we have the tools to answer it rigorously.

See use cases

A/B → 20-arm

Any experiment design

Bayesian posteriors

Not p-values

Causal inference

Adjusts for confounders

No SDK required

Field, process & physical trials

Process

How it works

01

Design

Pick a domain, define conditions, choose metrics. Use a template or build from scratch. Works for A/B, multi-arm, crossover, and adaptive designs.

02

Run

Collect observations manually, via CSV, or through your existing data systems. No SDK required for field trials, process experiments, or physical interventions.

03

Analyze

Bayesian inference with credible intervals, effect sizes, and plain-language summaries. Causal adjustments when confounders matter.

04

Decide

Get a clear recommendation: which condition wins, by how much, and with what confidence. Every result is documented — an audit trail for the decision, not just the data.

Why it matters

What changes when you experiment rigorously.

🚫

Reduce failed rollouts

Test before you scale. Catch underperformers at the pilot stage, before they cost real money.

📋

Audit trail for every decision

Every experiment has a complete record — what was tested, the conditions, the result, and why you chose what you scaled.

📉

Eliminate false positives

Bayesian credible intervals don't inflate under repeated peeking. You get honest uncertainty, not statistical theater.

🔬

No statistics team required

Results come with plain-language recommendations and probability-of-improvement. Your team decides, the math handles itself.

🌍

Any intervention, any context

From web traffic to field plots to production lines. The platform adapts to your data, not the other way around.

🔗

True causal effects

Adjust for confounders, estimate effects under intervention, and distinguish correlation from causation — built into every analysis.

Example

A fertilizer trial at 12 farms

A cooperative tests three nitrogen application rates across 12 farm plots over a growing season. Decision Process handles the randomized assignment, collects yield and input-cost observations, and delivers a Bayesian comparison of all three conditions — no statistics degree required.

  • 3-arm design: Low N (control), Standard N, High N
  • Metric: yield per acre (lbs) + input cost per acre (USD)
  • 12 farm plots, 1 growing season = 12 observations per arm
  • Result: Standard N achieves 94% of High N yield at 62% of cost

// Results: yield_per_acre

Low N (control)mean: 2,840 lbs/acre95% CI: 2,710–2,970
Standard Nmean: 3,210 lbs/acre95% CI: 3,090–3,340P(better) = 97%
High Nmean: 3,410 lbs/acre95% CI: 3,280–3,540P(better) = 99%

Standard N outperforms control with 97% probability. Effect size: d = +0.82 (large).

Positioning

Not just another A/B testing tool.

CapabilityGeneric A/B toolDecision Process
What you can testWebpages onlyAny domain
Metric typesConversion rateBinary, continuous, count
Design typesA/B onlyA/B, multi-arm, crossover, adaptive
Data collectionJavaScript SDKSDK, manual, CSV, API
Analysisp-valuesBayesian posteriors + causal inference
DeploymentWeb trafficPhysical locations, batches, people, plots

Nonprofits & academic institutions get full access free.

Rigorous causal inference shouldn't be gated by budget.

Apply for free access →

Ready to run your first experiment?

We're onboarding teams in private beta. Tell us about your use case and domain.

See pricing